Safety & Testing

“Vaccines are safe and effective.” Say it and again.


“Until meaningful objective vaccine safety testing are done, in my opinion the NIH, CDC, FDA can justifiably be accused of negligence in protecting the health and welfare of the American public, especially the children.” – Pediatrician Dr. Harold E Buttram, letter to BMJ.

Things You Should Know

  1. In the approval of vaccines, the traditional gold standard “double blind” method is not utilized. Control groups do not receive inert placebos, but often receive other vaccines or adjuvants (toxins that trigger the immune response).
  2. In CDC cited studies, the term “unvaccinated” can mean the child has been vaccinated with every other vaccine except the one the study is testing.
  3. The vaccine trials to approve vaccines and monitor vaccine side effects are typically between 2-5 days. (If a baby dies on day 6, it isn’t counted.)
  4. The pharmaceutical companies that make the vaccine and profit from the vaccine are involved in determining the safety trials used to approve the vaccine.
  5. There are no studies that test the safety of administering vaccines with other vaccines in multiple doses and combinations, per the CDC recommended schedule.
  6. In some vaccine trials, “adverse effects” are pre-determined. E.g., the scientist conducting the safety trial, paid by the manufacture, decides if a certain reaction is likely the result of a vaccine. If it doesn’t fit in the “pre-dertermined list”, it can be struck off the list as if it never happened.
  7. The Vaccine Court also has pre-determined “adverse events” and injuries they will accept.
  8. 4 out of 5 cases are denied by the US Vaccine Court.
  9. The more vaccines a child receives at one time, the more likely they are to be hospitalized and die. 2012, Dr. Gary Goldman and Neil Miller, Human and Experimental Toxicology. Yet, CDC, is approving bigger and bigger dose vaccines. The newest, Merck’s Vaxelis, will have six vaccines in one shot.

Conflicts of interest and biases exist in virtually every field of medicine, particularly this the rely heavily on drugs or devices. It is no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.” – Garcia Angella, MD, Harvard Medical Professor,

The Length of Time and Latitude to Determine Adverse Side Effects

The only polio vaccine, given to the American public for decades, was approved after safety trials monitored adverse reactions for only 48 hours following administration.

Recombivax, a world wide Hepatitis B shot, was only given to 147 babies, at 3 doses, who were monitored for 5 days after each dose. The age limit for the testing group was younger than 10 yrs of age. The vaccine is given at BIRTH, 2, and 6 months. Is this the type of safety profile you expect from a mandatory shot given to a baby that is just born? This trial did not test the vaccine along with the other vaccines the infants would also be given with CDC’s recommended vaccine schedule.

Gardasil, the HPV vaccine, monitored test subjects for 14 days after 3 doses of the vaccine (day of enrollment, 2 month, 6 months). Adverse effects participants experienced on day 15-60 or day 75-180; or 195 and on, could possibly not be defined as relating to the vaccine. In fact, “99.96% of all serious adverse reactions reported by the subjects themselves throughout the study period had nothing to do with the vaccine” as concluded by the lead scientists “and could therefore be dismissed from the tally.” If you break it down, that means only 4 in 10,000 of the most serious side effects were considered worthy of including in the report. (Moscowtiz, 32) Amazingly, CDC did not provide further scrutiny and approved the vaccine.

Timeframe of solicited adverse reactions asked about after each dose

Rotavirus, GKS Hep BDTaPHibPVC13MMRPolio-IPOlchickenpox
7 days4-5 days14 days4 days7 daysnone48 hours42 days

The safety trials of drugs “are supposedly third-party and independent, but the money won’t keep coming unless they support your drug, unless they say what you want them to say. Everybody knows that this is how things work. The drug companies know it, and you know it; only the public doesn’t know it.”- Dr. Peter Rost, former VP of Pfizer

How often do Vaccine Adverse Events Occur?

A study conducted by Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, with 715,000 patients over three years, estimated that “fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported” to the VAERS system. (Hadley, 63) In 2016, VAERS had nearly 60,000 reports, 10,000 hospitalizations and 432 deaths. If the study is correct, then that means there were over 5 million vaccine adverse events in the United States in one year. Further, 35,570 possible reactions were identified.

“Vaccine injuries only occur in one in a million!” Really? The above results indicate more like 2.6 out of every 100.

How did CDC respond to the study? Radio Silence. The lead investigators of the three year study were no longer able to get in contact with CDC consultants. CDC walked away from a 1 million dollar study. We can only conjecture as to why.

The reasons for lack of reporting is most people think vaccines are completely safe. Most people don’t know what a reaction to a vaccine looks like. Most doctors are not trained to recognized an adverse event. And many people that do, from parents to professional staff in the medical field, have been retaliated against.

What are Vaccine Adverse Events?

Six types of injuries from vaccines have been proven by scientific studies: acute encephalopathy (brain disease, damage or malfunction), arthritis – chronic and acute, shock and unusual shock-like state, anaphylaxis (life threatening allergic reaction) and protracted inconsolable crying.

Other common vaccine injuries, which account for 86 percent of the reports, include: “Encephalitis, encephalopathy, infantile spasms, aerial seizures, seizures, cerebellar ataxia, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, transverse myelitis, optic neuritis, neuromyelitis optics, multiple sclerosis, Guillain-Barre syndrome, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, brachial neuritis, amyotrophic material sclerosis, small fiver neuropathy, chronic urticaria, erythema nodosum, systemic lupus erythematous, polyarteritis nodes, psoriatic arthritis, reactive arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, arthralgia, autoimmune hepatitis, stroke, chronic headache, fibromyalgia, sudden infant death syndrome, hearing loss, thrombocytopenia, immune thrombocytopenia purpura.”

Interestingly, our CDC and NIH leaders and vaccine manufacturers have not looked further into the majority of complaints raised by thousands of parents.

What about Delayed Vaccine Adverse Events?

“…rare adverse events or adverse events with delayed onset are not easily detected during the relatively short duration of most preclinical and clinical phase studies. As proven over the years, safety surveillance in the general population post‐marketing is essential (Ward 2000Chen 2006). As an example, the childhood measles‐mumps‐rubella (MMR) vaccine was introduced in the late 1960s as a mixture of three live attenuated viruses, administered via injection (Offit 2007). Over time, doubts about its safety were raised when serious fever seizures, meningitis, and allergic reactions were reported among vaccinated people (Kimura 1996Dourado 2000Ward 2000). In Japan, a nationwide surveillance programme launched in the early 1990s screened more than 38,000 children vaccinated with four different Urabe‐containing MMR vaccines (Kimura 1996). Serious adverse events included convulsions and aseptic meningitis, and the incidence was shown to be linked to different vaccine strains of mumps virus (Kimura 1996). During the same time period, Brazil experienced a mass outbreak of aseptic meningitis following a Urabe‐containing MMR vaccine with an estimated risk of 1 in 14,000 doses (Dourado 2000).
Link

Do Vaccines Increase Your Risk of Other Infections?

Vaccinated Children May have a Higher Overall Mortality Rate
In a study published in 2017 in EBioMedicine, conducted by researchers from Research Center for Vitamins and Vaccines and Badim Health Project, looked at “nonspecific effects” from DTP and Polio-OPV vaccine given to children in Guinea-Bissau. (Yes, although DTP and OPV was banned in the US and other developed nations, it is still given to children in developing countries. And yes, these were the vaccines that authorities assured American parents were “safe an effective”, until they realized they weren’t.) Researchers discovered that vaccinated children, although less likely to die from diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, or polio had a 5x greater mortality risk from other infections/diseases. One might deduce that the vaccine created a weaker immune system, making them vulnerable to other life threatening diseases and risks. link

The Flu Shot
A 2015 study by he University of Calgary showed that people who take the flu shot are more likely to “get sick”. Dr. Jim Dickson stated, “A negative effectiveness suggests the vaccine made people more susceptible to the flu. We need to do more research to understand why this has happened.”

Read about the immune system to learn about more studies that link overcoming childhood diseases with better overall health.

New Vaccines

The Dengue Vaccine
Manufacturer, Sanfori, came out with a new vaccine for Dengue Fever, called Dangvaxia. They promoted it in the Philippines, administering the “new vaccine” to almost 700,000 children before the side effects became an issue of national contention, with children becoming even sicker from the vaccine than the natural disease. Dr. Scott Halstead simply stated that travesty, “It’s happened. We have a vaccine that enhances dengue.”

Philiipeano President, Rodriogo Duterte, stated, “We will halve no stone unturned in making those responsible for this shameless public health scam which puts hundreds of thousands of young lives at risk accountable.”

The HPV Vaccine, Cervarix, AS04 & Gardisil9
Originally, in 2009 Cervarix was available using a new aluminum adjuvant A-S04. in 2014, the US approved of another version, Gardisil9. Thousands of vaccine injury reports came in, including death. Over 650 girls in Ireland required medical intervention after the vaccine. Japan’s Vaccine Watchdog, Medwatcher Japan, raised the alarm by questioning the integrity of the World Health’s Organization who continued to promoted the vaccine despite the emerging growing literature of its side effects, “Countries other than Japan have also indicated major problems with the safety of HPV vaccines. Ignoring these “inconvenient” facts in an effort to promote HPV vaccination contradicts the primary responsibility of WHO, which is to dispassionately assess risks and benefits.”

Despite billions in sales from Gardisil9, the other version of the vaccine with the new adjuvant, Cervarix, is no longer available in the US market, due to “demand”.

Article associated with HPV 16 and death. link

Cross-Species ConcernPolio vaccine

The US vaccine is grown in monkey kidneys. The Salk vaccine, given between 1955-65, was found to have over 26 monkey viruses, one of which is SV-40, known to cause cancer, and can possibly be passed from mother to child. SIV is similar to HIV found in humans. 

Canada uses “human diploid cells” instead of monkey kidneys, “with mounting evidence that cross-species transfer of viruses can occur.” 

Testing can only be conducted for known viruses, “which is limited to about 2% of existing monkey viruses.” R. Desrosier

“The danger in using monkey tissue to produce human vaccines is that some viruses produced by monkeys may be transferable to humans in vaccines, with very bad health consequences.” – Ronald Desrosier, MD, Harvard professor

The Autistic Question

Vaccines are not related to autism. This has been said again and again. Let’s look at what has been studied to determine this conclusion.

Vaccines
A six month old infant, who has received the CDC recommended vaccine schedule, will have had a total of 9 vaccines, in over 30 total doses, and the number of shots are variable based on the combo shot given. How many of these vaccines have been evaluated in relation to autism (Influenza, Hep B, Hib, Rotavirus, DTaP (3), polio, PCV13)? ZERO.

Only the MMR has been studied which is given at 12-15 months. CDC whistleblower, showed that data was concealed that showed the MMR caused tics in African Americans, who were 3x more likely to have autism.

Ingredients
What about the ingredients in the vaccines? There are over 70 ingredients in vaccines, and only ONE has been studied, Thimerosal/ mercury.

The Autistic Science Foundation (ASF), uses 27 scientific studies to show no link between autism and vaccines exist. If you look further you realized 13 of the studies focus on thimerosal/mercury, 10 studies focus on the the MMR and 4 studies provide a meta-analysis of those 23 studies. Three vaccines (MMR), and one ingredient. That’s the scientific proof CDC gives you while continuing to push and augment the US vaccine list. Read more about vaccines and autism here.

(It’s worth knowing that ASF is a microphone for Dr. Offit, who holds the rotavirus patent which has made him very rich.)

“To begin with, it is unscientific and perilously misleading for anyone to assert that “vaccines and autism” have been studied and that no link has been found. That’s because the 16 or so studies constantly cited by critics of the hypothesis have examined just one vaccine and just one ingredient…. It is illegal to exonerate all vaccines, all ingredients, and the total US vaccine program as a whole, based solely on a handful of epidemiological studies of just one vaccine and one ingredient. It is akin to claiming that every form of animal protein in beneficial to people, when all you have studied is fish.”- David Kirby, former New York Times investigative journalist.